Where does one begin the quest to create freshly invented fictional digital/new media stories and characters that will draw in a workable public? Launched fiction has seen the depths and lots of humanity pass by and now’s authors find it mighty difficult to compete concerning originality. But for a new media narrative or a character to be successful, the author needs to fulfill another challenge; he must think up really adaptable story structures, taking into consideration not just his own comprehension of an evolving real world, but also rapidly changing technological traits. Storylines that shine with significance that’s as intriguing as it’s intended should become a sought after commodity, because they are a rare commodity. But they aren’t.
Now, fiction and human comprehension are colliding with settings the Surrealists could just dream about when they specified the actual as ‘absurdly real’. Fiction that is emerging today, in spite of all of the technical possibilities nevertheless, doesn’t meet a world that’s necessarily all that adapting.
Andre Breton wrote at the Surrealist Manifesto that he ‘believed in the future transmutation of those two seemingly contradictory states, dream and reality, into a sort of absolute reality, of surreality, so to speak. We reside the Surrealist dream, but private ideas are still measured in terms of highly rational parameters. And though the structures where we establish hypotheses for collective consciousness as a way of expressing ourselves purposeful or not as purposeful, are inclined to be built on logical assumptions Whether we grasp these is often the question. But humanity is hell bent only furthering its progress all the time, and a few people feel that this drive is something that indicates meaning. Get more information click www.masternewmedia.org
Interest in human affairs is closely connected to human consciousness. However broad the expression ‘human consciousness’ might encounter as, it is also the very mechanism that manifests itself in incredibly narrow minded thoughts. Think of our obsession with stars, together with finding out the latest gossip concerning the boss. Our curiosity with our own comprehension is sourced by identical fascination. Take for instance your interest in tales surrounding the real circumstances where the idea for a famous story was conceived. ‘Mary Shelley thought up Frankenstein when she was in a house with a group of people in the middle of nowhere Scotland’, is bound to create ears prick up. We all like finding out intimate details about famous subjects. Incidentally, Shelley wrote her story after thinking this up in basic type when a single winter she discovered herself indeed stuck in a home with a couple buddies in the middle of nowhere Scotland. They chose to have a competition making up the scariest story. Guess who won. Does sidestory make your reading the publication next all the more exciting?
There’s is nothing wrong with this obsession. We believe it’s even imperative to check to the limit exactly what procedures are involved in composing. Not so much since the writing will be all that more interesting (that also) but mostly to explore what the outside triggers really are that influenced the fiction in the first location. After the Surrealists were running their automated writing experiments they found out by simply tapping into an outside realm, they linked to each other. Their writings seemed to communicate messages which were mostly the same!
To have a hint of what’s cooking is way more appetizing than the meal that ultimately hits the table. A miracle occurred when these painters were conducting their own experiments; this was a bunch of painters revealing to the world writers’ secrets! Something writers often don’t generally own up to. It made us wonder about the impact that real events have on fiction in general.
What are the influences that govern a writer’s ideas, and how do these ideas ultimately take shape on paper? Does it mean anything that a book was written in a particular season? Modern technology has advanced so much that perhaps the study of actual writing might reveal what’s going on in this process.
Even though today’s changes have been foreseen since decades -the Surrealists were predicting the emergence of virtual worlds with eery precision- nothing less than the actual practical emergence of technologies and new media formats apparently only spurs people’s efforts to theorize. The phrase ‘narrative portability’ is among the first workable new terms of indicating a general definition and practical applications (written literature, oral conversation, drama, film, painting, dance and mime, etc). It is employed by Marie Laure Ryan, an independent scholar specializing in narrative theory and new media etc..
Theorists’ ‘inventory accounting’ confirms the majority of the ideas that Roland Barthes released in the last Century. Marie Laure Ryan writes in an article that’s printed in the forthcoming Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative which narratology itself is considered ‘a project that transcends disciplines and media’. It has been this way since the word started to circulate in academic circles, she asserts.
Herbert Marcuse also mostly covered this land, suggesting it is imperative to prove that true consciousness comprises of transcendence, even though it might not instantly make sense in the modern technology governed world based on a totalitarian assumption that there isn’t any justification for this kind of transcendence.
The idea of complete rationality has worn out many masks throughout the ages, and Marcuse believes that technological transmutation is its newest (if not last) mask, that has pushed logic as a means of understanding to a dominant determining procedure by mixing theory and practice into one. “It is new because it is rational to an unprecedented degree”, he states, adding that the crux of this business is just the elimination of background. Marcuse and his followers warn against blending content with moderate, stating the language that is involved to describe processes highlights that believing that one dimension (rational textual independence) really doesn’t link into a higher, transcendent fact, leads to some language that is strung together as a series of empty controls (a leads to b, leads to c leads to d).
Could this explain the unhappy condition of hyperfiction? This area is only due to a critical mass of genius. A couple of books made it into the degree of literature however despite frenzied activity in self-publication, hyperfiction is generally considered a backwater. Readers would rather read real books instead of text on a display, despite the fact that the net took off on the thought which you can link texts.
Casting some light about the problem, the scholar Michael Chaoili, warns against blending critical theory using technology. In a post entitled “How Interactive Can Fiction Be?” Chaoili disagrees strongly with individuals who believe that hypertext creates a literal embodiment of concepts found in literary concept. One should not take a theoretical short circuit and also take the literal for your metaphorical, Chaoili claims. He says that the game industry is often considered totally off the mark in supposing that narrative and text simply are part of a game’s setting. He believes this is hopeless. Somehow a reader should still be fed lines which make sense in the old fashioned way – tales continue to be very much tales. They’re clearly conceived in an author’s mind, rather than a part of a mishmash of ideas or a backdrop or setting.